39
results
-
A lightweight vocabulary for hypermedia-driven Web APIs @en
-
RML-IO enables the description of input data sources and target output data serialization @en
-
Module for data schema specifications, part of the W3C Web of Things (WoT) Thing Description model @en
-
An historical ontology used by the cwm command-line tool back in the very early days of the semantic web (~ 2000- 2003 ?) @en
-
An ontology for describing changes between OWL ontology versions @en
-
odapps is an RDF vocabulary defined to facilitate the description of Open-Data-based ideas and applications published on the Web. @en
-
A reference implementation of the OntoUML metamodel in OWL. @en
-
The Patch Request Ontology provides a schema to describe desired changes in Linked Data. By wrapping the Graph Update Ontology (guo) patch requests can be formulated to add, modify or delete particular triples (or subgraphs) within a dataset. @en
-
A vocabulary for describing the ontology design pattern of property reification. @en
-
This vocabulary is for describing relationships between standards/specifications, profiles of them and supporting artifacts such as validating resources. This model starts with [http://dublincore.org/2012/06/14/dcterms#Standard](dct:Standard) entities which can either be Base Specifications (a standard not profiling any other Standard) or Profiles (Standards which do profile others). Base Specifications or Profiles can have Resource Descriptors associated with them that defines implementing rules for the it. Resource Descriptors must indicate the role they play (to guide, to validate etc.) and the formalism they adhere to (dct:format) to allow for content negotiation. A vocabulary of Resource Roles are provided alongside this vocabulary but that list is extensible. @en
-
An OWL vocabulary to include and exploit probabilistic information in SHACL validation reports @en
-
This document describes the RDFa Vocabulary for Term and Prefix Assignment. The Vocabulary is used to modify RDFa 1.1 processing behavior @en
-
Properties allowing statement of intensional equivalence between RDF graphs @en
-
## RDF Presentation and RDF Presentation Negotiation An RDF graph can be presented in several ways, using different media types. Examples of RDF media types include `application/rdf+xml`, `text/turtle`, `application/json+ld`. Today, most of the content consumed/produced/published, on the Web is not presented in RDF. In the Web of Things, HTTP servers and clients would rather exchange lightweight documents, potentially binary. Currently, most existing RDF Presentations generically apply to any RDF graph, at the cost of being heavy text-based documents. Yet, lightweight HTTP servers/clients could be better satisfied with consuming/producing/publishing lightweight documents, may its structure be application-specific. @en
-
This is a vocabulary document and is used to define classes and properties used in RDF 1.1 Test Cases and associated test manifests. The URI of the vocabulary is http://www.w3.org/ns/rdftest# (abbreviated by rdft: in this document). Turtle and an JSON-LD versions of the vocabulary are also available. The vocabulary is published by W3C. @en