173
results
  • The AtomOWL ontology is inspired from the work done by the atom working group. This ontology is working off the rfc 4287 published among othe places at http://www.atompub.org/rfc4287.html . The AtomOWL ontology uses as much as possible the same terms as the format there to make the relation easy to understand. The AtomOWL name space is slightly different from the atom namespace [see post http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/msg16476.html]. But this is a good thing as it helps distinguish the ontology from the rfc 4287 serialisation. @en
  • An RDF/OWL vocabulary to represent SRTI DATEX II profile (according the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 886/2013) within the European LOD-RoadTran18 action "Supporting the cross-border use of Road Traffic Data with Linked Open Data based on DATEX II (LOD-RoadTran18)" (Agreement No: INEA/CEF/ICT/A2018/1803421, Action No: 2018-EU-IA-0088). The vocabulary is used for mapping between DATEX II and LOD formats. @en
  • Simple and direct pricing ontology for Cloud Computing Services. This ontology allows to define model of prices used in large cloud computing providers such as Amazon, Azure, etc., including options for regions, type of instances, prices specification, etc. @en
  • Ontology for the definition of regions and zones of availability on CloudComputing platforms and services. This ontology allows to define model of regions used in large cloud computing providers such as Amazon, Azure, etc. @en
  • Service Level Agreement for Cloud Computing Services. This ontology allows to define model of SLA/SLO used in large cloud computing providers such as Amazon, Azure, etc., including terms, claims, credit, compensations, etc @en
  • Common Tags are references to unique, well-defined concepts, complete with metadata and their own URLs. @en
  • Ontology for Cloud Computing Instances. Instance are classes of VM that comprise varying combinations of CPU, memory, storage, and networking capacity. This ontology allows to define the instantiation model of MVs used in large cloud computing providers such as Amazon, Azure, etc. @en
  • The ontology of the taxonomy "European Skills, Competences, qualifications and Occupations". The ontology considers three ESCO pillars (or taxonomy) and 2 registers. The three pillars are: - Occupation - Skill (and competences) - Qualification For the construction and use of the ESCO pillars, the following modelling artefacts are used: - Facetting support to specialize ESCO pillar concepts based on bussiness relevant Concept Groups (e.g. species, languages, ...) - Conept Groups, Thesaurus array and Compound terms (as detailed in ISO 25964) to organize faceted concepts - SKOS mapping properties to relate ESCO pillar concepts to concepts in other (external) taxonomies (e.g. FoET, ISCO88 and ISCO08. More mappings can be added in the future.) - Tagging ESCO pillar concepts by other (external) taxonomies (NUTS, EQF, NACE, ...) - Capture gender specifics on the labels of the ESCO pillar concepts - Rich ESCO concept relationships holding a description and other specific characteristics of the relation between two ESCO pillar concepts. ESCO maintains two additional registers: - Awarding Body - Work Context Awarding Bodies typically are referenced by ESCO qualifications. Occupations can have one or more work context. @en
  • This is the human and machine readable Vocabulary/Ontology governed by the European Union Agency for Railways. It represents the concepts and relationships linked to the sectorial legal framework and the use cases under the Agency´s remit. Currently, this vocabulary covers the European railway infrastructure and the vehicles authorized to operate over it. It is a semantic/browsable representation of the RINF and ERATV application guides that were built by domain experts in the RINF and ERATV working parties. Since version 2.6.0, the ontology includes the routebook concepts described in appendix D2 \"Elements the infrastructure manager has to provide to the railway undertaking for the Route Book\" (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2019/773/oj) and the appendix D3 \"ERTMS trackside engineering information relevant to operation that the infrastructure manager shall provide to the railway undertaking\". @en
  • The Identifier Ontology models non-RDF based Identifiers for resources. It is used to maintain a mapping between RDF resources identifiers and their equivalent IDs in an alternate, non-RDF based domain. @en
  • Press.net Tag Ontology defines relationships for semantically annotating taggable things (for example news assets) with domain entities (stuff) and events. @en
  • A vocabulary to annotate RDF schemas (in particular SHACL shapes) with metadata to define mappings to GraphQL. @en
  • An OWL representation of parts of the Geographic Metadata model described in ISO 19115:2003 with Corrigendum 2006 - LI Package @en
  • R4R is a light-weight ontology for representing general relationships of resource for publication and reusing. It asserts that a certain reusing context occurred and determined by its two basic relations, namely, isPackagedWith and isCitedBy. The isPackagedWith relation declares the resource is ready to be reused by incorporating License and Provenance information. The Cites relation is an exceptional to isCitedBy which occurs only two related objects cite each other at the same time. Five resource objects including article, data, code, provenance and license are major class concepts to represent in this ontology. The namespace for all R4R terms is http://guava.iis.sinica.edu.tw/r4r/ @en
  • hRESTS is a vocabulary for describing RESTful Web services @en