155
results
-
The Smart Appliances REFerence (SAREF) ontology is a shared model of consensus that facilitates the matching of existing assets (standards/protocols/datamodels/etc.) in the smart appliances domain. The SAREF ontology provides building blocks that allow separation and recombination of different parts of the ontology depending on specific needs. @en
-
The development of the SAREF4GRID ontology has been partially funded by the IA4TES project (MIA.2021.M04.0008), funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economic Affairs and Digital Transformation and by the NextGenerationEU program @en
-
This is the extension of SAREF for the EEBus and Energy@Home project. The documentation of SAREF4EE is available at http://ontology.tno.nl/SAREF4EE_Documentation_v0.1.pdf. SAREF4EE represents 1) The configuration information exchanged in the use case 'Remote Network Management' according to the EEBus Technical Report, Protocol Specification- Remote Network Management, version 1.0.0.2, 2015-09-19; 2) The scheduling information about power sequences exchanged in the use cases Appliance scheduling through CEM and remote start' and 'Automatic cycle rescheduling', according to the message structures described in General Message Structures, version 0.1.1, 2015-10-07; 3) The monitor and control information exchanged in the use case 'Communicate appliance status and info on manually planned cycles', according to the monitoring and control part of the Energy@Home Data Model, version 1.0; and 4) the event-based data exchanged in the use case 'Demand Response', according to General Message Structures, version 0.1.1, 2015-10-07. @en
-
The eccenca Publish-Subscribe Vocabulary defines concepts and relations to create statements about publishers, subscribers and their subscriptions in a Publish-Subscribe environment based on the PubSubHubbub Core 0.4 specification. @en
-
GConsent provides concepts and relationships for defining consent and its associated information or metadata with a view towards GDPR compliance. It is the outcome of an analysis of consent and requirements associated with obtaining, using, and changes in consent as per the GDPR. The ontology also provides an approach to using its terms in various scenarios and use-cases (see more information in the documentation) which is intended to assist in its adoption. @en
-
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) is comprised of several articles, each with points that refer to specific concepts. The general convention of referring to these points and concepts is to quote the specific article or point using a human-readable reference. This ontology provides a way to refer to the points within the GDPR using the EurLex ontology published by the European Publication Office. It also defines the concepts defined, mentioned, and requried by the GDPR using the Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS) ontology. @en
-
GDPRov is an OWL2 ontology to express provenance metadata of consent and data lifecycles towards documenting compliance for GDPR. @en
-
Ontology for the orchestration of the aerOS continuum. @en
-
AIRO represents AI risk concepts and relations based on the AI Act draft and ISO 31000 standard series. @en
-
The Core module represents general-purpose concepts orthogonal to the whole network, which are imported by all other ontology modules (e.g. part-whole relation, classification). @en
-
The Context Description module includes models for the context of a cultural property, in a broad sense: agents (e.g.: author, collector, copyright holder), objects (e.g.: inventories, bibliography, protective measures, other cultural properties, collections etc.), activities (e.g.: surveys, conservation interventions), situations (e.g.: commission, coin issuance, estimate, legal situation) related, involved or involving the cultural property. Thus it represents attributes that do not result from a measurement of features in a cultural property, but are associated with it. @en
-
The Denotative Description module encodes the characteristics of a cultural property, as detectable and/or detected during the cataloguing process and measurable according to a reference system. Examples include measurements e.g. length, constituting materials e.g. clay, employed techniques e.g. melting, conservation status e.g. good, decent, bad. In this module are used as template the following Ontology Design Patterns: - http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/collectionentity.owl - http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/classification.owl - http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/descriptionandsituation.owl - http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/situation.owl @en
-
Simple ontology for Cloud Computing Services. This ontology allows to define model of prices used in large cloud computing providers such as Google, Amazon, Azure, etc., including options for regions, type of instances, prices specification, etc. @en
-
The DNS Security Ontology (DSecO) project is a data model for representing and reasoning on Domain Name System (DNS) data. The ontology is developed using web technologies (e.g. RDF, OWL, SKOS) and is intended as a structure for realizing a DNS Knowledge Graph (KG) for administration and security assessment applications. The model has been developed in collaboration with operational teams, and in connection with third parties linked vocabularies. Alignment with third parties vocabularies is implemented on a per class or per property basis when relevant (e.g. with `rdfs:subClassOf`, `owl:equivalentClass`). Directions for direct instanciation of these vocabularies are provided for cases where implementing a class/property alignment is redundant. Alignment holds for the following vocabulary releases: - [ORG](https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-org/) 0.8 - [UCO](https://github.com/ucoProject/uco) Release-0.8.0 @en
-
The scope of the DIO is the domain of design intent or design rationale that needs to be documented while undertaking the design of any artifact @en