163
results
  • The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) is comprised of several articles, each with points that refer to specific concepts. The general convention of referring to these points and concepts is to quote the specific article or point using a human-readable reference. This ontology provides a way to refer to the points within the GDPR using the EurLex ontology published by the European Publication Office. It also defines the concepts defined, mentioned, and requried by the GDPR using the Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS) ontology. @en
  • The Internet of Things taxonomy is extended with semantic ontologies for IoT layers, containing classes, properties, individuals, and rules specific to IoT technologies, tools, and applications @en
  • OntoGSN is an ontology for managing assurance cases in the Goal Structuring Notation (GSN). The goal of the ontology is to help users in linking the elements of their cases - claims and evidence - with the internationalized resource identifiers (IRIs) of represented concepts, events and data, and in evaluating the validity of their argument. @en
  • Metadata vocabularies are used in various domains of study. It provides an in-depth description of the resources. In this work, we develop Algorithm Metadata Vocabulary (AMV), a vocabulary for capturing and storing the metadata about the algorithms (a procedure or a set of rules that is followed step-by-step to solve a problem, especially by a computer). The snag faced by the researchers in the current time is the failure of getting relevant results when searching for algorithms in any search engine. AMV is represented as a semantic model and produced OWL file, which can be directly used by anyone interested to create and publish algorithm metadata as a knowledge graph, or to provide metadata service through SPARQL endpoint. To design the vocabulary, we propose a well-defined methodology, which considers real issues faced by the algorithm users and the practitioners. The evaluation shows a promising result. @en
  • This document is a vocabulary to describe compound measures, i.e. measures with several metric or item that are organized with serveral dimensions. The description of such a measure relies on a Tree-Structure of Requirement (TSoR): a set of requirements structured hierarchicaly with analysis element. A TSoR represents the main measure. Several information may be added to explicitely indicate how the overall score on the measure should be calculated based on the hierarchy, relative importance of the node of the hierarchy and an aggregation function. The measure can be described completely and unambiguously from the organisation to the requirements and the implementation. @en
  • The Construction Dataset Context (CDC) ontology is an extension of DCAT v2.0, a W3C Recommendation ontology for describing (RDF and non-RDF) datasets published on the Web. Using this extension, it becomes possible to describe a context for construction-related datasets that are being distributed using Web technology as well as datasets that are not shared outside an organization such as local copies, work in progress and other datasets that remain internal. This dataset metadata encompasses the temporal context (period or snapshot), the type of content of the dataset (as-built, design, etc.) and relations between contextualized datasets (previous as-built, requirements related to a design, etc.). In addition, this DCAT extension also provides terminology for managing dataset distributions that are scoped to a certain (named or default) graph of an RDF file or quadstore. @en
  • The Building Topology Ontology (BOT) is a simple ontology defining the core concepts of a building. It is a simple, easy to extend ontology for the construction industry to document and exchange building data on the web. Changes since version 0.2.0 of the ontology are documented in: https://w3id.org/bot/bot.html#changes The version 0.2.0 of the ontology is documented in: Mads Holten Rasmussen, Pieter Pauwels, Maxime Lefrançois, Georg Ferdinand Schneider, Christian Anker Hviid and Jan Karlshøj (2017) Recent changes in the Building Topology Ontology, 5th Linked Data in Architecture and Construction Workshop (LDAC2017), November 13-15, 2017, Dijon, France, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320631574_Recent_changes_in_the_Building_Topology_Ontology The initial version 0.1.0 of the ontology was documented in: Mads Holten Rasmussen, Pieter Pauwels, Christian Anker Hviid and Jan Karlshøj (2017) Proposing a Central AEC Ontology That Allows for Domain Specific Extensions, Lean and Computing in Construction Congress (LC3): Volume I – Proceedings of the Joint Conference on Computing in Construction (JC3), July 4-7, 2017, Heraklion, Greece, pp. 237-244 https://doi.org/10.24928/JC3-2017/0153 @en
  • An ontology containing additional terminology for structuring and annotating RDFS/OWL taxonomies for describing constructions (components, materials, spatial zones, damages, construction tasks and properties). It also functions as an index for known taxonomies starting from root classes and properties. @en
  • The Construction Tasks Ontology (CTO) describes tasks operating on construction elements, spatial zones and/or damages. The tasks are either planned or executed depending on the dataset metadata context of the dataset its used in. Five different types of tasks are defined: instalment, removal, modification, repair and inspection. Consequences of tasks on the dataset, i.e. added and/or deleted triples, are modeled using reified statements. The tasks can link to a reified statement using the CTO relations. @en
  • The Building Concrete Monitoring Ontology (BCOM) is defined for capturing information of concrete work, concrete curing and testing of concrete properties. Further Information on the development and usage of the Ontology can be found in the following publication: Liu et al. (2021): An ontology integrating as-built information for infrastructure asset management using BIM and semantic web. In: Proceedings of 2021 European Conference on Computing in Construction, Online eConference, URL: https://ec-3.org/publications/conferences/2021/paper/?id=167 @en
  • Ontology that defines the topology of damages in constructions. @en
  • Digital Twin ontology used to define Digital Twins and Semantic Digital Twins and aggregations by dimensions using Web of Things. @en
  • An ontology for describing changes between OWL ontology versions @en
  • The Geometry Metadata Ontology contains terminology to Coordinate Systems (CS), length units and other metadata (file size, software of origin, etc.). GOM is designed to be at least compatible with OMG (Ontology for Managing Geometry) and FOG (File Ontology for Geometry formats), and their related graph patterns. In addition, GOM provides terminology for some experimental data structures to manage (marked as vs:term_status = unstable): * transformed geometry (e.g. a prototype door geometry that is reused for all doors of this type). This is closely related to the transformation of Coordinate Systems @en