148
results
  • CTRLont specifies concepts and relationships of control actors on a high level @en
  • This ontology defines classes and properties for describing participants, infrastructure, data and services of the International Data Spaces (formerly known as Industrial Data Space). @en
  • Information about authentication providers which might be identity providers or other services such as ones providing JSON Web Tokens. @en
  • OWL ontology for the IFC conceptual data schema and exchange file format for Building Information Model (BIM) data @en
  • This ontology provides the terms necessary to describe the status of traffic lights. @en
  • The Ontology for Property Management (OPM) extends the concepts introduced in the Smart Energy Aware Systems (SEAS) Evaluations ontology. @en
  • This ontology describes the components, failures, sensors, and events related to offshore wind platforms. @en
  • The NORIA-O project is a data model for IT networks, events and operations information. The ontology is developed using web technologies (e.g. RDF, OWL, SKOS) and is intended as a structure for realizing an IT Service Management (ITSM) Knowledge Graph (KG) for Anomaly Detection (AD) and Risk Management applications. The model has been developed in collaboration with operational teams, and in connection with third parties linked vocabularies. Alignment with third parties vocabularies is implemented on a per class or per property basis when relevant (e.g. with `rdfs:subClassOf`, `owl:equivalentClass`). Directions for direct instanciation of these vocabularies are provided for cases where implementing a class/property alignment is redundant. Alignment holds for the following vocabulary releases: - [BBO](https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02365012/) 1.0.0 - [BOT](https://w3id.org/bot/) 0.3.2 - [DevOps-Infra](https://oeg-upm.github.io/devops-infra/) 1.0.0 - [FOLIO](https://github.com/IBCNServices/Folio-Ontology) 1.0.0 - [ORG](https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-org/) 0.8 - [PEP](https://w3id.org/pep/) 1.1 - [SEAS](https://w3id.org/seas/) 1.1 - [SLOGERT](https://sepses.ifs.tuwien.ac.at/ns/log/index-en.html) 1.1.0 - [UCO](https://github.com/ucoProject/uco) Release-0.8.0 @en
  • The aim of the Occupant Feedback Ontology is to semantically describe passive and active occupant feedback and to enable integration of this feedback with linked building data. @en
  • The SEAS Device ontology defines `seas:Device` as physical system that are designed to execute one or more procedures that involve the physical world. @en
  • The SEAS Forecasting ontology extends the [Procedure Execution ontology (PEP)](https://w3id.org/pep/) @en
  • This ontology defines a vocabulary for describing provenance traces of carbon emission calculations by capturing the quantifiable measurements of carbon emission sources used by some activities (e.g., electricity used by a machinery to produce a product, petrol used to make a car journey, etc.) and emission conversion factors used to estimate the carbon emissions produced by these. In addition, the ontology provides the ability to capture various data transformations that occurred before energy estimates may be used with relevant conversion factors. For example, sensors may provide raw readings about a water flow of an irrigation rig in an agri-food operation which is then used as a proxy to estimate the total volume of fertilisers used. @en
  • The process execution ontology is a proposal for a simple extension of both the [W3C Semantic Sensor Network](https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-ssn/) and the [Semantic Actuator Network](https://www.irit.fr/recherches/MELODI/ontologies/SAN.owl) ontology cores. @en
  • ## RDF Presentation and RDF Presentation Negotiation An RDF graph can be presented in several ways, using different media types. Examples of RDF media types include `application/rdf+xml`, `text/turtle`, `application/json+ld`. Today, most of the content consumed/produced/published, on the Web is not presented in RDF. In the Web of Things, HTTP servers and clients would rather exchange lightweight documents, potentially binary. Currently, most existing RDF Presentations generically apply to any RDF graph, at the cost of being heavy text-based documents. Yet, lightweight HTTP servers/clients could be better satisfied with consuming/producing/publishing lightweight documents, may its structure be application-specific. @en