157
results
  • This is the extension of SAREF for the EEBus and Energy@Home project. The documentation of SAREF4EE is available at http://ontology.tno.nl/SAREF4EE_Documentation_v0.1.pdf. SAREF4EE represents 1) The configuration information exchanged in the use case 'Remote Network Management' according to the EEBus Technical Report, Protocol Specification- Remote Network Management, version 1.0.0.2, 2015-09-19; 2) The scheduling information about power sequences exchanged in the use cases Appliance scheduling through CEM and remote start' and 'Automatic cycle rescheduling', according to the message structures described in General Message Structures, version 0.1.1, 2015-10-07; 3) The monitor and control information exchanged in the use case 'Communicate appliance status and info on manually planned cycles', according to the monitoring and control part of the Energy@Home Data Model, version 1.0; and 4) the event-based data exchanged in the use case 'Demand Response', according to General Message Structures, version 0.1.1, 2015-10-07. @en
  • This ontology extends the SAREF ontology for the environment domain, specifically for the light pollution domain, including concepts like photometers, light, etc. @en
  • The Internet of Things taxonomy is extended with semantic ontologies for IoT layers, containing classes, properties, individuals, and rules specific to IoT technologies, tools, and applications @en
  • OntoGSN is an ontology for managing assurance cases in the Goal Structuring Notation (GSN). The goal of the ontology is to help users in linking the elements of their cases - claims and evidence - with the internationalized resource identifiers (IRIs) of represented concepts, events and data, and in evaluating the validity of their argument. @en
  • The Core module represents general-purpose concepts orthogonal to the whole network, which are imported by all other ontology modules (e.g. part-whole relation, classification). @en
  • Ontology for the orchestration of the aerOS continuum. @en
  • The Construction Dataset Context (CDC) ontology is an extension of DCAT v2.0, a W3C Recommendation ontology for describing (RDF and non-RDF) datasets published on the Web. Using this extension, it becomes possible to describe a context for construction-related datasets that are being distributed using Web technology as well as datasets that are not shared outside an organization such as local copies, work in progress and other datasets that remain internal. This dataset metadata encompasses the temporal context (period or snapshot), the type of content of the dataset (as-built, design, etc.) and relations between contextualized datasets (previous as-built, requirements related to a design, etc.). In addition, this DCAT extension also provides terminology for managing dataset distributions that are scoped to a certain (named or default) graph of an RDF file or quadstore. @en
  • The Building Topology Ontology (BOT) is a simple ontology defining the core concepts of a building. It is a simple, easy to extend ontology for the construction industry to document and exchange building data on the web. Changes since version 0.2.0 of the ontology are documented in: https://w3id.org/bot/bot.html#changes The version 0.2.0 of the ontology is documented in: Mads Holten Rasmussen, Pieter Pauwels, Maxime Lefrançois, Georg Ferdinand Schneider, Christian Anker Hviid and Jan Karlshøj (2017) Recent changes in the Building Topology Ontology, 5th Linked Data in Architecture and Construction Workshop (LDAC2017), November 13-15, 2017, Dijon, France, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320631574_Recent_changes_in_the_Building_Topology_Ontology The initial version 0.1.0 of the ontology was documented in: Mads Holten Rasmussen, Pieter Pauwels, Christian Anker Hviid and Jan Karlshøj (2017) Proposing a Central AEC Ontology That Allows for Domain Specific Extensions, Lean and Computing in Construction Congress (LC3): Volume I – Proceedings of the Joint Conference on Computing in Construction (JC3), July 4-7, 2017, Heraklion, Greece, pp. 237-244 https://doi.org/10.24928/JC3-2017/0153 @en
  • An ontology containing additional terminology for structuring and annotating RDFS/OWL taxonomies for describing constructions (components, materials, spatial zones, damages, construction tasks and properties). It also functions as an index for known taxonomies starting from root classes and properties. @en
  • The Construction Tasks Ontology (CTO) describes tasks operating on construction elements, spatial zones and/or damages. The tasks are either planned or executed depending on the dataset metadata context of the dataset its used in. Five different types of tasks are defined: instalment, removal, modification, repair and inspection. Consequences of tasks on the dataset, i.e. added and/or deleted triples, are modeled using reified statements. The tasks can link to a reified statement using the CTO relations. @en
  • Simple ontology for Cloud Computing Services. This ontology allows to define model of prices used in large cloud computing providers such as Google, Amazon, Azure, etc., including options for regions, type of instances, prices specification, etc. @en
  • The Building Concrete Monitoring Ontology (BCOM) is defined for capturing information of concrete work, concrete curing and testing of concrete properties. Further Information on the development and usage of the Ontology can be found in the following publication: Liu et al. (2021): An ontology integrating as-built information for infrastructure asset management using BIM and semantic web. In: Proceedings of 2021 European Conference on Computing in Construction, Online eConference, URL: https://ec-3.org/publications/conferences/2021/paper/?id=167 @en
  • Ontology that defines the topology of damages in constructions. @en
  • The scope of the DIO is the domain of design intent or design rationale that needs to be documented while undertaking the design of any artifact @en
  • Digital Twin ontology used to define Digital Twins and Semantic Digital Twins and aggregations by dimensions using Web of Things. @en