105
results
-
The Denotative Description module encodes the characteristics of a cultural property, as detectable and/or detected during the cataloguing process and measurable according to a reference system. Examples include measurements e.g. length, constituting materials e.g. clay, employed techniques e.g. melting, conservation status e.g. good, decent, bad. In this module are used as template the following Ontology Design Patterns: - http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/collectionentity.owl - http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/classification.owl - http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/descriptionandsituation.owl - http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/situation.owl @en
-
The Core module represents general-purpose concepts orthogonal to the whole network, which are imported by all other ontology modules (e.g. part-whole relation, classification). @en
-
The Context Description module includes models for the context of a cultural property, in a broad sense: agents (e.g.: author, collector, copyright holder), objects (e.g.: inventories, bibliography, protective measures, other cultural properties, collections etc.), activities (e.g.: surveys, conservation interventions), situations (e.g.: commission, coin issuance, estimate, legal situation) related, involved or involving the cultural property. Thus it represents attributes that do not result from a measurement of features in a cultural property, but are associated with it. @en
-
Ontology for the orchestration of the aerOS continuum. @en
-
Simple ontology for Cloud Computing Services. This ontology allows to define model of prices used in large cloud computing providers such as Google, Amazon, Azure, etc., including options for regions, type of instances, prices specification, etc. @en
-
The scope of the DIO is the domain of design intent or design rationale that needs to be documented while undertaking the design of any artifact @en
-
The DINGO ontology (Data Integration for Grant Ontology) defines the terms of the DINGO vocabulary and provides a machine readable extensible framework to model data relative to projects, funding, project and funding actors, and, notably, funding policies. It is designed to yield high modeling power and elasticity to cope with the huge variety in funding and project practices, which makes it applicable to many areas where funding is an important aspect: first of all research, but also the arts, cultural conservation, and many others. @en
-
Extension to the Data Privacy Vocabulary (DPV) providing additional categories of personal data @en
-
The DNS Security Ontology (DSecO) project is a data model for representing and reasoning on Domain Name System (DNS) data. The ontology is developed using web technologies (e.g. RDF, OWL, SKOS) and is intended as a structure for realizing a DNS Knowledge Graph (KG) for administration and security assessment applications. The model has been developed in collaboration with operational teams, and in connection with third parties linked vocabularies. Alignment with third parties vocabularies is implemented on a per class or per property basis when relevant (e.g. with `rdfs:subClassOf`, `owl:equivalentClass`). Directions for direct instanciation of these vocabularies are provided for cases where implementing a class/property alignment is redundant. Alignment holds for the following vocabulary releases: - [ORG](https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-org/) 0.8 - [UCO](https://github.com/ucoProject/uco) Release-0.8.0 @en
-
CTRLont specifies concepts and relationships of control actors on a high level @en
-
This ontology defines classes and properties for describing participants, infrastructure, data and services of the International Data Spaces (formerly known as Industrial Data Space). @en
-
This ontology provides the terms necessary to describe the status of traffic lights. @en
-
The aim of the Occupant Feedback Ontology is to semantically describe passive and active occupant feedback and to enable integration of this feedback with linked building data. @en
-
The process execution ontology is a proposal for a simple extension of both the [W3C Semantic Sensor Network](https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-ssn/) and the [Semantic Actuator Network](https://www.irit.fr/recherches/MELODI/ontologies/SAN.owl) ontology cores. @en
-
The SEAS Building ontology describes a taxonomy of buildings, building spaces, and rooms. Some categorizations are based on the energy efficiency related to their insulation etc., although the actual values for classes depend the country specific regulations and geographical locations. Other categorizations are based on occupancy and activities. There is no single accepted categorization available. This taxonomy uses some types selected from: - International building occupancy based categories (USA) - The Classification of Types of Constructions (EU) - Finnish building categorization VTJ2000 (Finland) - Wikipedia category page for Rooms: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Rooms @en