109
results
-
The notion of territory plays a major role in human and social sciences. In an historical context, most approaches are irrelevant as they rely on geometric data, which is not available. In order to represent historical territories,we conceived the HHT ontology (Hierarchical Historical Territory) to represent hierarchical historical territorial divisions, without having to know their geometry. This approach relies on a notion of building blocks to replace polygonal geometry @en
-
The Cultural Event module models cultural events, i.e. events involving cultural properties. @en
-
The Core module represents general-purpose concepts orthogonal to the whole network, which are imported by all other ontology modules (e.g. part-whole relation, classification). @en
-
Ontology for the orchestration of the aerOS continuum. @en
-
Simple ontology for Cloud Computing Services. This ontology allows to define model of prices used in large cloud computing providers such as Google, Amazon, Azure, etc., including options for regions, type of instances, prices specification, etc. @en
-
The scope of the DIO is the domain of design intent or design rationale that needs to be documented while undertaking the design of any artifact @en
-
The DINGO ontology (Data Integration for Grant Ontology) defines the terms of the DINGO vocabulary and provides a machine readable extensible framework to model data relative to projects, funding, project and funding actors, and, notably, funding policies. It is designed to yield high modeling power and elasticity to cope with the huge variety in funding and project practices, which makes it applicable to many areas where funding is an important aspect: first of all research, but also the arts, cultural conservation, and many others. @en
-
The DNS Security Ontology (DSecO) project is a data model for representing and reasoning on Domain Name System (DNS) data. The ontology is developed using web technologies (e.g. RDF, OWL, SKOS) and is intended as a structure for realizing a DNS Knowledge Graph (KG) for administration and security assessment applications. The model has been developed in collaboration with operational teams, and in connection with third parties linked vocabularies. Alignment with third parties vocabularies is implemented on a per class or per property basis when relevant (e.g. with `rdfs:subClassOf`, `owl:equivalentClass`). Directions for direct instanciation of these vocabularies are provided for cases where implementing a class/property alignment is redundant. Alignment holds for the following vocabulary releases: - [ORG](https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-org/) 0.8 - [UCO](https://github.com/ucoProject/uco) Release-0.8.0 @en
-
The BDI Ontology provides a formal framework to model the Belief-Desire-Intention (BDI) architecture for rational agents. It defines key mental states—Beliefs, Desires, and Intentions—and their relationships, capturing the agent’s reasoning, motivation, and commitment to action. Supporting classes include Propositions (content of mental states), Justifications (rationale for mental states), Plans (action sequences for goals), and TimeIntervals (temporal validity of entities). Key properties like hasBelief, hasDesire, and hasIntention link agents to mental states, while fulfills, adoptsIntention, and motivatesDesire model dynamic interactions. Temporal properties enable reasoning about time-sensitive states and plans. Axioms ensure consistency, such as disjointness between mental states and domain-specific constraints. This ontology supports reasoning, querying, and analysis of agent behaviour, enabling applications in AI, multi-agent systems, and decision support. @en
-
CTRLont specifies concepts and relationships of control actors on a high level @en
-
This ontology defines classes and properties for describing participants, infrastructure, data and services of the International Data Spaces (formerly known as Industrial Data Space). @en
-
This ontology provides the terms necessary to describe the status of traffic lights. @en
-
The aim of the Occupant Feedback Ontology is to semantically describe passive and active occupant feedback and to enable integration of this feedback with linked building data. @en
-
The process execution ontology is a proposal for a simple extension of both the [W3C Semantic Sensor Network](https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-ssn/) and the [Semantic Actuator Network](https://www.irit.fr/recherches/MELODI/ontologies/SAN.owl) ontology cores. @en
-
This ontology defines feature of interest and their properties, as an extension of the core classes of the SSN ontology (https://www.w3.org/ns/ssn/). A feature of interest is an abstraction of a real world phenomena (thing, person, event, etc). A feature of interest is then defined in terms of its properties, which are qualifiable, quantifiable, observable or operable qualities of the feature of interest. Alignments to other ontologies are proposed in external documents: - [SSNAlignment](https://w3id.org/seas/SSNAlignment) proposes an alignment to the [SSN ontology](http://www.w3.org/ns/ssn/). - [QUDTAlignment](https://w3id.org/seas/QUDTAlignment) proposes an alignment to the [QUDT ontology](http://qudt.org/). @en