94
results
  • Defines temporal / spatial concepts and general-purpose datastructures @en
  • The initiative Aragón Open Data was initiated by agreement of 17 of July of 2012 of the Government of Aragon. Under the same was ordered the start of the project to open public data and on February 6, 2013 was implemented through the Portal <a href="http://opendata.aragon.es/"> opendata.aragon.es </a>. Throughout this time there have been numerous works to achieve automation in the publication of information to ensure that third parties can reuse it in the best way. Given the volume of data that begins to exist, within the line of work of automation in information management, all those elements that help in the improvement of the <b> structuring of information </b> and the <b> standardization of the data </b> contained in the databases are beginning to have a special relevance. Based on this, within the General Directorate of Electronic Administration and Information Society, the idea arises of generating a set of technical and legal rules that allow to deepen in that standardization and that lead to think in the creation of the Interoperable Information Scheme Of Aragon (E2IA). The E2IA thus emerges as the framework in which the open data and in general the information of the Government of Aragon can begin to be automated in a much more profound way. The E2IA has to have a number of technical, organizational and legal elements that need to be developed. For this reason, the Technological Institute of Aragon (ITAINNOVA) has been entrusted with carrying out actions consisting in identifying, studying and analyzing current research trends and technological development in relation to ontologies and dictionaries of data interoperability, defining the ontological proposal, performing The necessary tests to validate the ontological proposal and generate the text and web versions of the ontology. @en
  • This ontology models personalized tourist experiences by representing cities, points of interest, events, accommodations, restaurants, transportation, and their relationships. This ontology is part of a university project. @en
  • APCO is an ontology that allows the description of public procurement terms @en
  • This ontology extends the SAREF ontology for the Smart City domain. This work has been developed in the context of the STF 534 (https://portal.etsi.org/STF/STFs/STFHomePages/STF534.aspx), which was established with the goal to create three SAREF extensions, one of them for the Smart City domain. @en
  • The Crime Event Model is an ontology for the representation of crime events extracted from local newspapers. It could be employed for Crime Analysis purposes: extracting crime information from newspapers and enriching them with proper machine-readable semantics is a critical task to help law enforcement agencies at preventing crime, supporting criminal investigations and evaluating the action of law enforcement agencies themselves. The model is based on the fundamental 5W1H journalistic questions, that are Who?, What?, When?, Where?, Why? and How?. Another important requirement was the attempt to exploit existing knowledge graphs and ontologies such as the Simple Event Model (SEM) Ontology and the Schema.org data model for interoperability and interconnection. @en
  • The notion of territory plays a major role in human and social sciences. In an historical context, most approaches are irrelevant as they rely on geometric data, which is not available. In order to represent historical territories,we conceived the HHT ontology (Hierarchical Historical Territory) to represent hierarchical historical territorial divisions, without having to know their geometry. This approach relies on a notion of building blocks to replace polygonal geometry @en
  • The Cultural Event module models cultural events, i.e. events involving cultural properties. @en
  • The module Location models information related to the localization and georeferencing of a cultural property. In this module are used as template the following Ontology Design Patterns: - http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/collectionentity.owl - http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/classification.owl - http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/place.owl - http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/timeindexedsituation.owl - http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/situation.owl @en
  • Ontology that defines the topology of damages in constructions. @en
  • The BDI Ontology provides a formal framework to model the Belief-Desire-Intention (BDI) architecture for rational agents. It defines key mental states—Beliefs, Desires, and Intentions—and their relationships, capturing the agent’s reasoning, motivation, and commitment to action. Supporting classes include Propositions (content of mental states), Justifications (rationale for mental states), Plans (action sequences for goals), and TimeIntervals (temporal validity of entities). Key properties like hasBelief, hasDesire, and hasIntention link agents to mental states, while fulfills, adoptsIntention, and motivatesDesire model dynamic interactions. Temporal properties enable reasoning about time-sensitive states and plans. Axioms ensure consistency, such as disjointness between mental states and domain-specific constraints. This ontology supports reasoning, querying, and analysis of agent behaviour, enabling applications in AI, multi-agent systems, and decision support. @en
  • This ontology defines feature of interest and their properties, as an extension of the core classes of the SSN ontology (https://www.w3.org/ns/ssn/). A feature of interest is an abstraction of a real world phenomena (thing, person, event, etc). A feature of interest is then defined in terms of its properties, which are qualifiable, quantifiable, observable or operable qualities of the feature of interest. Alignments to other ontologies are proposed in external documents: - [SSNAlignment](https://w3id.org/seas/SSNAlignment) proposes an alignment to the [SSN ontology](http://www.w3.org/ns/ssn/). - [QUDTAlignment](https://w3id.org/seas/QUDTAlignment) proposes an alignment to the [QUDT ontology](http://qudt.org/). @en
  • The Procedural Knowledge Ontology (PKO) addresses the Procedural Knowledge (PK) domain, and models procedures, their executions, and related resources and agents. @en
  • The vocabulary allows for the description of data about scientific events such as conferences, symposiums and workshops. @en
  • Ontology 'Usability' created to describe and store information about interactions of user with a software user interface @en