109
results
-
The ISA Programme Location Core Vocabulary provides a minimum set of classes and properties for describing any place in terms of its name, address or geometry. The vocabulary is specifically designed to aid the publication of data that is interoperable with EU INSPIRE Directive. @en
-
This ontology is based on the SSN Ontology by the W3C Semantic Sensor Networks Incubator Group (SSN-XG), together with considerations from the W3C/OGC Spatial Data on the Web Working Group. @en
-
Defines temporal / spatial concepts and general-purpose datastructures @en
-
This ontology extends the SAREF ontology for the water domain. This work has been developed in the context of the STF 566, which was established with the goal to create three SAREF extensions, one of them for the water domain. @en
-
This is the extension of SAREF for the EEBus and Energy@Home project. The documentation of SAREF4EE is available at http://ontology.tno.nl/SAREF4EE_Documentation_v0.1.pdf. SAREF4EE represents 1) The configuration information exchanged in the use case 'Remote Network Management' according to the EEBus Technical Report, Protocol Specification- Remote Network Management, version 1.0.0.2, 2015-09-19; 2) The scheduling information about power sequences exchanged in the use cases Appliance scheduling through CEM and remote start' and 'Automatic cycle rescheduling', according to the message structures described in General Message Structures, version 0.1.1, 2015-10-07; 3) The monitor and control information exchanged in the use case 'Communicate appliance status and info on manually planned cycles', according to the monitoring and control part of the Energy@Home Data Model, version 1.0; and 4) the event-based data exchanged in the use case 'Demand Response', according to General Message Structures, version 0.1.1, 2015-10-07. @en
-
This ontology extends the SAREF ontology for the environment domain, specifically for the light pollution domain, including concepts like photometers, light, etc. @en
-
The notion of territory plays a major role in human and social sciences. In an historical context, most approaches are irrelevant as they rely on geometric data, which is not available. In order to represent historical territories,we conceived the HHT ontology (Hierarchical Historical Territory) to represent hierarchical historical territorial divisions, without having to know their geometry. This approach relies on a notion of building blocks to replace polygonal geometry @en
-
The module Location models information related to the localization and georeferencing of a cultural property. In this module are used as template the following Ontology Design Patterns: - http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/collectionentity.owl - http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/classification.owl - http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/place.owl - http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/timeindexedsituation.owl - http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/situation.owl @en
-
Ontology that defines the topology of damages in constructions. @en
-
This ontology describes wildlife observations generated by sensors. @en
-
The Geometry Metadata Ontology contains terminology to Coordinate Systems (CS), length units and other metadata (file size, software of origin, etc.). GOM is designed to be at least compatible with OMG (Ontology for Managing Geometry) and FOG (File Ontology for Geometry formats), and their related graph patterns. In addition, GOM provides terminology for some experimental data structures to manage (marked as vs:term_status = unstable): * transformed geometry (e.g. a prototype door geometry that is reused for all doors of this type). This is closely related to the transformation of Coordinate Systems @en
-
This ontology defines a vocabulary for describing carbon emission conversion factors (CF). These are values typically used to calculate carbon emissions where the CF multiplies a quantified estimate of the energy (e.g., kWh of electricity, litters of fuel, etc.) used by a particular activity. @en
-
A simple ontology which implements the Parameter Usage Vocabulary semantic model, as described at https://github.com/nvs-vocabs/P01 @en
-
The File Ontology for Geometry formats (FOG) describes meaningful relations towards geometry snippets in RDF literals, geometry files on relative or absolute URLs and ontology-based geometry descriptions. The defined properties in this ontology are related towards each other and additional metadata is provided, such as file extension and related specifications/sources (incl. entries in dbpedia and Wikidata). The initial version of the ontology (v0.0.1) was documented in: Bonduel, Mathias, Wagner, Anna, Pauwels, Pieter, Vergauwen, Maarten, & Klein, Ralf (2019). Including Widespread Geometry Formats in Semantic Graphs Using RDF Literals. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computing in Construction (EC3 2019). Chania, Greece. @en
-
The I-ADOPT Framework ontology @en