77
results
-
A vocabulary which can be used to specify a mapping of relational data to RDF. @en
-
This document specifies the D2RQ mapping language. D2RQ is a declarative language to describe mappings between relational database schemata and OWL/RDFS ontologies. @en
-
Web Of Trust (wot) RDF vocabulary, described using W3C RDF Schema and the Web Ontology Language. @en
-
The ontology is aimed at the support of research groups in the field of Business Modeling and Knowledge Engineering (BMaKE) in their collaborative work for qualitatively analyzing scholarly papers as well as sharing the results of that analyses and judgements. @en
-
The development of the SAREF4GRID ontology has been partially funded by the IA4TES project (MIA.2021.M04.0008), funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economic Affairs and Digital Transformation and by the NextGenerationEU program @en
-
A vocabulary & data model for describing RDF changes and revisions. It defines the Commit & Revision classes together with their expected properties. @en
-
GDPRov is an OWL2 ontology to express provenance metadata of consent and data lifecycles towards documenting compliance for GDPR. @en
-
AIRO represents AI risk concepts and relations based on the AI Act draft and ISO 31000 standard series. @en
-
Data Specification Vocabulary (DSV) is a vocabulary for describing semantic data specifications, namely vocabularies and application profiles. @en
-
An ontology for describing changes between OWL ontology versions @en
-
The FAIR Assessment Ontology is designed to model the process and outcomes of evaluating digital objects according to the FAIR principles. It captures FAIR assessments as provenance-aware activities, linking evaluated resources to detailed results for each FAIR sub-principle. Each assessment can include multiple sub-principle results, associated evidence, quantitative scores, and test outcomes (e.g., pass, fail, indeterminate). The ontology also models the computational aspects of FAIR evaluation, including scoring functions, calculation algorithms, and aggregation methods used to derive higher-level scores. The ontology is aligned with the FAIR Vocabulary (https://w3id.org/fair/principles/terms/) for the definition of principles and sub-principles, and reuses established standards such as PROV-O for provenance and SKOS for controlled vocabularies. This ensures interoperability with existing FAIR tools and supports integration into automated FAIR assessment pipelines. @en
-
A reference implementation of the OntoUML metamodel in OWL. @en
-
## RDF Presentation and RDF Presentation Negotiation An RDF graph can be presented in several ways, using different media types. Examples of RDF media types include `application/rdf+xml`, `text/turtle`, `application/json+ld`. Today, most of the content consumed/produced/published, on the Web is not presented in RDF. In the Web of Things, HTTP servers and clients would rather exchange lightweight documents, potentially binary. Currently, most existing RDF Presentations generically apply to any RDF graph, at the cost of being heavy text-based documents. Yet, lightweight HTTP servers/clients could be better satisfied with consuming/producing/publishing lightweight documents, may its structure be application-specific. @en
-
Quality, architecture, and process are considered the keystones of software engineering. ISO defines them in three separate standards. However, their interaction has been poorly studied, so far. The SQuAP model (Software Quality, Architecture, Process) describes twenty-eight main factors that impact on software quality in banking systems, and each factor is described as a relation among some characteristics from the three ISO standards. Hence, SQuAP makes such relations emerge rigorously, although informally. SQaAP-Ont is an OWL ontology that formalises those relations in order to represent and reason via Linked Data about software engineering in a three-dimensional model consisting of quality, architecture, and process characteristics. @en
-
A vocabulary specifying concepts and structures needed to represent different data cubes needed for the Smart Readiness Indicator. @en