Derive from the EAC-CPF original XML schema. Encoded Archival Context for Corporate Bodies, Persons, and Families provides a grammar for encoding names of creators of archival materials and related information. @en
awol- Atom Syndication Ontology
http://bblfish.net/work/atom-owl/2006-06-06/
The AtomOWL ontology is inspired from the work done by the atom working group. This ontology is working off the rfc 4287 published among othe places at http://www.atompub.org/rfc4287.html . The AtomOWL ontology uses as much as possible the same terms as the format there to make the relation easy to understand. The AtomOWL name space is slightly different from the atom namespace [see post http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/msg16476.html]. But this is a good thing as it helps distinguish the ontology from the rfc 4287 serialisation. @en
pproc- PPROC ontology
http://contsem.unizar.es/def/sector-publico/pproc
The PPROC ontology defines the necessary concepts to describe public procurement process and the contracts of public sector (public e-procurement). The ontology has been designed with the main purpose of publishing data about public contracts. @en
oad- Ontology for archival description
http://culturalis.org/oad#
An ontology for the description of archival data (OAD, “Ontology of Archival Description”) using the Web Ontology Language (OWL). This ontology represents the classes and properties needed to expose the archival resources as linked data. @en
gndo- GND Ontology
http://d-nb.info/standards/elementset/gnd#
GND stands for "Gemeinsame Normdatei" (Integrated Authority File) and offers a broad range of elements to describe authorities. The GND originates from the German library community and aims to solve the name ambiguity problem in the library world. @en
locah- The LOCAH RDF Vocabulary
http://data.archiveshub.ac.uk/def/
This vocabulary derived from the Encoded Archival Description standard has been developed in 2010-2011 by the LOCAH project. @en
eli- The European Legislation Identifier
http://data.europa.eu/eli/ontology
Transposition of the ELI metadata fields into an OWL ontology @en
pnc- Press.net Classification Ontology
http://data.press.net/ontology/classification/
The Press.net Classification Ontology allows assets to be holistically classified using a controlled vocabulary or taxonomy. @en
graphql- GraphQL Vocabulary
http://datashapes.org/graphql
A vocabulary to annotate RDF schemas (in particular SHACL shapes) with metadata to define mappings to GraphQL. @en
ispra- Ispra Ontology
http://dati.isprambiente.it/ontology/core#
ISPRA ontology aims at the description of the processes and activities of the Institute in the areas circumscribed by the first published datasets. @en
san-lod- SAN Ontologia
http://dati.san.beniculturali.it/SAN/
SAN Ontology @en
ep- EPrints Ontology
http://eprints.org/ontology/
Describes the main classes and properties which EPrints adds to voID, DC, BIBO and SKOS etc @en
hr- hRESTS Ontology
http://iserve.kmi.open.ac.uk/ns/hrests
hRESTS is a vocabulary for describing RESTful Web services @en
msm- Minimal Service Model
http://iserve.kmi.open.ac.uk/ns/msm
A simple RDF(S) ontology able to capture (part of) the semantics of both Web services and Web APIs @en
ends- Vocabulary of endpoint status (availability, responseTime)
http://labs.mondeca.com/vocab/endpointStatus
Endpoint Status vocabulary intends to describe endpoint availability @en