Linked Open Vocabularies

Vocabs
Terms
Agents
SPARQL/Dump
Patterns

How to

Select the ontologies from which you want to extract patterns.

Select patterns options:

Name, Type or both:

Name: Ontology elements in the patterns represent specific classes and properties names.

For example:

# INPUT
s4bldg:BuildingSpace rdfs:subClassOf [
  rdf:type owl:Restriction ;
  owl:onProperty s4bldg:isSpaceOf ;
  owl:allValuesFrom [
    rdf:type owl:Class ;
    owl:unionOf (
      s4bldg:Building
      s4bldg:BuildingSpace
    )
  ]
]

# OUTPUT
Pattern 16
owl:Class
|rdfs:subClassOf
| |owl:Restriction
| | |owl:allValuesFrom
| | | |owl:Class
| | | | |owl:unionOf
| | | | | |rdf:List
| | | | | | |rdf:first
| | | | | | | |owl:Class
| | | | | | |rdf:rest
| | | | | | | |rdf:List
| | | | | | | | |rdf:first
| | | | | | | | | |owl:Class
| | | | | | | | |rdf:rest
| | | | | | | | | |rdf:nil
| | |owl:onProperty

# INPUT
s4bldg:BuildingSpace rdfs:subClassOf [
  rdf:type owl:Restriction ;
  owl:onProperty s4bldg:isSpaceOf ;
  owl:allValuesFrom [
    rdf:type owl:Class ;
    owl:unionOf (
      s4bldg:Building
      s4bldg:BuildingSpace
    )
  ]
]

# OUTPUT
Pattern 16
owl:Class
|rdfs:subClassOf
| |owl:Restriction
| | |owl:allValuesFrom
| | | |owl:Class
| | | | |owl:unionOf
| | |owl:onProperty

Type: Ontology elements in the patterns are generalized according to the OWL elements used.

No specific classes or properties are used, but OWL skeletons like:

owl:Class
  |rdfs:subClassOf
  |  |owl:Restriction
  |  |  |owl:onProperty
  |  |  |  |owl:DatatypeProperty, owl:FunctionalProperty
  |  |  |owl:someValuesFrom
  |  |  |  |rdfs:Datatype

Flatten or not:
1. Flatten: If there are collections of classes or individuals in the pattern, the full collection is not included.
  ¿SERGIO esto aplica a los named? O solo a los que se generalizan como Type?
  
  Otra cosa es que estaría bien indicar algunos ejemplos, pensaba que se incluían 3.
```
owl:Class
  |owl:equivalentClass
  |  |owl:Class
  |  |  |owl:oneOf
```

Output: Tengo que ver el output final y definir esto en detalle

The retrieved .zip file contains the following folders and documents:

“Data” folder. This folder contains the files:
- A
- B
- C
“flatten” folder (if selected): This folder contains the files:
- A
- B
- C
“not_flatten” folder (if selected): This folder contains the files:
- A
- B
- C
HTML folder. This folder contains the files:
- A
- B
- C

160

results

How to

pimsii - Physicalistic Interpretation of Modelling and Simulation - Interoperability Infrastructure (PIMS-II)
http://www.molmod.info/semantics/pims-ii.ttl

The Physicalistic Interpretation of Modelling and Simulation - Interoperability Infrastructure (PIMS-II) is a mid-level ontology with a focus on documenting cognitive processes and epistemic metadata @en
oecc - Extended Creative Commons Ontology
http://www.oegov.org/core/owl/cc

Creative Commons Ontology, extending RDF file at http://creativecommons.org/schema.rdf @en
irw - The Identity of Resources on the Web ontology
http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/web/irw.owl

This ontology is an evolution of IRE ontology. It describes identification of resources on the Web, through the definition of relationships between resources and their representations on the Web. The requirement is to describe what can be identified by URIs and how this is handled e.g. in form of HTTP requests and reponds. @en
cpa - Content Pattern Annotations
http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/schemas/cpannotationschema.owl

A set of annotation properties to be used for ontology design patterns @en
vs - SemWeb Vocab Status ontology
http://www.w3.org/2003/06/sw-vocab-status/ns

An RDF vocabulary for relating SW vocabulary terms to their status. @en
rdfg - Graph
http://www.w3.org/2004/03/trix/rdfg-1/

Properties allowing statement of intensional equivalence between RDF graphs @en
swp - Graph Authority
http://www.w3.org/2004/03/trix/swp-1

This vocabulary allows to attach an authority to a named graph @en
log - SWAP Logic Ontology
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/log

An historical ontology used by the cwm command-line tool back in the very early days of the semantic web (~ 2000- 2003 ?) @en
fresnel - Fresnel Lens and Format Core Vocabulary
http://www.w3.org/2004/09/fresnel

OWL Full vocabulary for defining lenses and formats on RDF models. @en
test - Test Metadata
http://www.w3.org/2006/03/test-description

This ontology aims at defining the Quality Assurance Framework by collecting the test development experience of W3C Working Groups and summarizing the work done about tests and metadata. @en
rec54 - Model of the W3C Process
http://www.w3.org/2001/02pd/rec54#

This is (the start of) an event-based model of the W3C process; e.g. RECdd is the class of Recommendation Director's Decisions; i.e. messages to w3c-ac-members announcing a new W3C Recommendation. @en
adms - Asset Description Metadata Schema
http://www.w3.org/ns/adms

ADMS is a profile of DCAT, used to describe semantic assets (or just 'Assets'), defined as highly reusable metadata (e.g. xml schemata, generic data models) and reference data (e.g. code lists, taxonomies, dictionaries, vocabularies) that are used for eGovernment system development. @en
cert - The Cert Ontology
http://www.w3.org/ns/auth/cert#

Ontology for Certificates and crypto stuff. @en
dqv - Data Quality Vocabulary
http://www.w3.org/ns/dqv

The Data Quality Vocabulary (DQV) is seen as an extension to DCAT to cover the quality of the data, how frequently is it updated, whether it accepts user corrections, persistence commitments etc. When used by publishers, this vocabulary will foster trust in the data amongst developers. @en
cnt - Representing Content in RDF
http://www.w3.org/2011/content

Representing Content in RDF as defined by http://www.w3.org/TR/Content-in-RDF/ @en

1...5 678 9...11

Selected vocabularies

Patterns?:	type name both
Flatten?:	yes no

Type

vocabulary (160)
property/class >
agent >

Language

English (115)
en (7)
German (5)
French (3)
Italian (2)
Japanese (2)
Czech (1)
Korean (1)
Spanish (1)

: Linked Open Vocabularies

Documentation

About
API documentation
Contact

Este trabajo ha recibido financiación del proyecto PIONERA (Potenciando la interoperabilidad en espacios de datos mediante inteligencia artificial), un proyecto financiado en el contexto de la convocatoria Productos y Servicios tecnológicos para Espacio de Datos del Ministerio para la Transformación Digital y de la Función Pública en el marco del PRTR financiado por Unión Europea (NextGenerationEU)