128
results
How to
  • dtype - Datatype Ontology
    http://www.linkedmodel.org/schema/dtype
    The ontology 'dtype' provides a specification of simple data types such as enumerations. These are needed in support of the conversion of XML Schemas and UML Models to OWL. Codelists are also defined in 'dtype'. @en
  • irw - The Identity of Resources on the Web ontology
    http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/web/irw.owl
    This ontology is an evolution of IRE ontology. It describes identification of resources on the Web, through the definition of relationships between resources and their representations on the Web. The requirement is to describe what can be identified by URIs and how this is handled e.g. in form of HTTP requests and reponds. @en
  • rdfg - Graph
    http://www.w3.org/2004/03/trix/rdfg-1/
    Properties allowing statement of intensional equivalence between RDF graphs @en
  • swp - Graph Authority
    http://www.w3.org/2004/03/trix/swp-1
    This vocabulary allows to attach an authority to a named graph @en
  • log - SWAP Logic Ontology
    http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/log
    An historical ontology used by the cwm command-line tool back in the very early days of the semantic web (~ 2000- 2003 ?) @en
  • fresnel - Fresnel Lens and Format Core Vocabulary
    http://www.w3.org/2004/09/fresnel
    OWL Full vocabulary for defining lenses and formats on RDF models. @en
  • test - Test Metadata
    http://www.w3.org/2006/03/test-description
    This ontology aims at defining the Quality Assurance Framework by collecting the test development experience of W3C Working Groups and summarizing the work done about tests and metadata. @en
  • cert - The Cert Ontology
    http://www.w3.org/ns/auth/cert#
    Ontology for Certificates and crypto stuff. @en
  • dqv - Data Quality Vocabulary
    http://www.w3.org/ns/dqv
    The Data Quality Vocabulary (DQV) is seen as an extension to DCAT to cover the quality of the data, how frequently is it updated, whether it accepts user corrections, persistence commitments etc. When used by publishers, this vocabulary will foster trust in the data amongst developers. @en
  • cnt - Representing Content in RDF
    http://www.w3.org/2011/content
    Representing Content in RDF as defined by http://www.w3.org/TR/Content-in-RDF/ @en
  • duv - Dataset Usage Vocabulary
    http://www.w3.org/ns/duv
    The Dataset Usage Vocabulary (DUV) is used to describe consumer experiences, citations, and feedback about datasets from the human perspective. @en
  • prof - Profiles Vocabulary
    http://www.w3.org/ns/dx/prof
    This vocabulary is for describing relationships between standards/specifications, profiles of them and supporting artifacts such as validating resources. This model starts with [http://dublincore.org/2012/06/14/dcterms#Standard](dct:Standard) entities which can either be Base Specifications (a standard not profiling any other Standard) or Profiles (Standards which do profile others). Base Specifications or Profiles can have Resource Descriptors associated with them that defines implementing rules for the it. Resource Descriptors must indicate the role they play (to guide, to validate etc.) and the formalism they adhere to (dct:format) to allow for content negotiation. A vocabulary of Resource Roles are provided alongside this vocabulary but that list is extensible. @en
  • earl - Evaluation and Report Language
    http://www.w3.org/ns/earl
    EARL is a vocabulary, the terms of which are defined across a set of specifications and technical notes, and that is used to describe test results. The primary motivation for developing this vocabulary is to facilitate the exchange of test results between Web accessibility evaluation tools in a vendor-neutral and platform-independent format. It also provides reusable terms for generic quality assurance and validation purposes. @en
  • hydra - The Hydra Core Vocabulary
    http://www.w3.org/ns/hydra/core
    A lightweight vocabulary for hypermedia-driven Web APIs @en
  • oa - Open Annotation Data Model
    http://www.w3.org/ns/oa#
    The Open Annotation Core Data Model specifies an interoperable framework for creating associations between related resources, annotations, using a methodology that conforms to the Architecture of the World Wide Web. This ontology is a non-normative OWL formalization of the textual OA specification at http://www.openannotation.org/spec/core/20130208/index.html @en