138
results
  • wfm - The Workflow Motif Ontology
    http://purl.org/net/wf-motifs
    Ontology for describing Workflow Motifs. Workflow Motifs outline the kinds of data-intensive activities that are observed in workflows (data-operation motifs) and the different manners in which activities are implemented within workflows (workflow-oriented motifs). @en
  • wo - Weighting Ontology
    http://purl.org/ontology/wo/core#
    The Weighting Ontology specification provides a vocabulary for describing weightings and their referenced scales, on/ for the Semantic Web. @en
  • awol - Atom Syndication Ontology
    http://bblfish.net/work/atom-owl/2006-06-06/
    The AtomOWL ontology is inspired from the work done by the atom working group. This ontology is working off the rfc 4287 published among othe places at http://www.atompub.org/rfc4287.html . The AtomOWL ontology uses as much as possible the same terms as the format there to make the relation easy to understand. The AtomOWL name space is slightly different from the atom namespace [see post http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/msg16476.html]. But this is a good thing as it helps distinguish the ontology from the rfc 4287 serialisation. @en
  • graphql - GraphQL Vocabulary
    http://datashapes.org/graphql
    A vocabulary to annotate RDF schemas (in particular SHACL shapes) with metadata to define mappings to GraphQL. @en
  • obws - Object with states ontology
    http://delicias.dia.fi.upm.es/ontologies/ObjectWithStates.owl
    Ontology including the content ontology design pattern for modelling objects with states. @en
  • h2o - Ontology for conversion of ISO/TC 211
    http://def.seegrid.csiro.au/isotc211/iso19150/-2/2012/basic
    This ontology establishes classes corresponding to stereotypes used in ISO-conformant models, as used in the rules for conversion of the ISO TC 211 Harmonized Model from the UML to OWL representations @en
  • sam - The Sampling Features Schema Vocabulary
    http://def.seegrid.csiro.au/isotc211/iso19156/2011/sampling
    An OWL representation of the Sampling Features Schema described in clauses 8-10 of ISO 19156:2011 Geographic Information - Observations and Measurements. @en
  • ends - Vocabulary of endpoint status (availability, responseTime)
    http://labs.mondeca.com/vocab/endpointStatus
    Endpoint Status vocabulary intends to describe endpoint availability @en
  • hr - hRESTS Ontology
    http://iserve.kmi.open.ac.uk/ns/hrests
    hRESTS is a vocabulary for describing RESTful Web services @en
  • msm - Minimal Service Model
    http://iserve.kmi.open.ac.uk/ns/msm
    A simple RDF(S) ontology able to capture (part of) the semantics of both Web services and Web APIs @en
  • mexcore - MEX Core Vocabulary
    http://mex.aksw.org/mex-core
    MEX is an RDF vocabulary designed to facilitate interoperability between published machine learning experiments results on the Web. The mex-core layer represents the core information gathered from a basic machine learning experiment design. @en
  • mexalgo - MEX Algorithm Ontology
    http://mex.aksw.org/mex-algo
    MEX is an RDF vocabulary designed to facilitate interoperability between published machine learning experiments results on the Web. The mex-algo layer represents the algorithm information existing into a basic machine learning experiment. @en
  • mexperf - MEX Performance Ontology
    http://mex.aksw.org/mex-perf
    MEX is an RDF vocabulary designed to facilitate interoperability between published machine learning experiments results on the Web. The mex-perf layer is the 3rd level of the MEX for representing the machine learning algorithm's performances. @en
  • tac - TripleAccessControl Ontology
    http://ns.bergnet.org/tac/0.1/triple-access-control
    The TripleAccessControl Ontology is an extension to WebAccessControl Ontology to describe access control rules for RDF triples. @en
  • dbowl - Relational to Ontology Mapping Primitive
    http://ontology.cybershare.utep.edu/dbowl
    Primitive ontology for database to Semantic Web mapping which subsumes classes that represent mappings to explicit OWL constructs, such as OWL class, object property, data property, etc. Classes in this ontology are populated by individuals representing components of the database schema being mapped. @en