26
results
  • A vocabulary for describing the ontology design pattern of property reification. @en
  • This vocabulary is for describing relationships between standards/specifications, profiles of them and supporting artifacts such as validating resources. This model starts with [http://dublincore.org/2012/06/14/dcterms#Standard](dct:Standard) entities which can either be Base Specifications (a standard not profiling any other Standard) or Profiles (Standards which do profile others). Base Specifications or Profiles can have Resource Descriptors associated with them that defines implementing rules for the it. Resource Descriptors must indicate the role they play (to guide, to validate etc.) and the formalism they adhere to (dct:format) to allow for content negotiation. A vocabulary of Resource Roles are provided alongside this vocabulary but that list is extensible. @en
  • An OWL vocabulary to include and exploit probabilistic information in SHACL validation reports @en
  • ## RDF Presentation and RDF Presentation Negotiation An RDF graph can be presented in several ways, using different media types. Examples of RDF media types include `application/rdf+xml`, `text/turtle`, `application/json+ld`. Today, most of the content consumed/produced/published, on the Web is not presented in RDF. In the Web of Things, HTTP servers and clients would rather exchange lightweight documents, potentially binary. Currently, most existing RDF Presentations generically apply to any RDF graph, at the cost of being heavy text-based documents. Yet, lightweight HTTP servers/clients could be better satisfied with consuming/producing/publishing lightweight documents, may its structure be application-specific. @en
  • This is a vocabulary document and is used to define classes and properties used in RDF 1.1 Test Cases and associated test manifests. The URI of the vocabulary is http://www.w3.org/ns/rdftest# (abbreviated by rdft: in this document). Turtle and an JSON-LD versions of the vocabulary are also available. The vocabulary is published by W3C. @en
  • The RECO ontology defines the vocabulary for representing preferences-as-constraints and preferences-as-ratings as RDF graphs. This lightweight vocabulary provides domain-independent means to describe user profiles in a coherent and context-aware way. RECO has been designed as an extension of both Friend-Of-A-Friend (FOAF) and Who Am I! (WAI) ontologies. @en
  • Generic Mapping Language for RDF (RDB/CSV/TSV/XML/JSON/... to RDF) - Vocabulary description @en
  • RML module for generating RDF-star graphs @en
  • A vocabulary which can be used to specify a mapping of relational data to RDF. @en
  • RDF-STaX is an OWL 2 DL ontology that enables describing the types of RDF streams and defines relations between them. @en
  • An RDF vocabulary for extending some SKOS and ISO-THES functions in order to improve the linked data consumption of SKOS datasets @en